| タイトル | Entry Systems Panel |
| 本文（外部サイト） | http://hdl.handle.net/2060/19930012908 |
| 著者（英） | Bersch, Charlie; Rummler, Donald R.; Rasky, Daniel J.; Dixon, Sidney C. |
| 著者所属（英） | NASA Ames Research Center |
| 発行日 | 1993-02-01 |
| 言語 | eng |
| 内容記述 | As general findings, lessons learned from shuttle are: (1) bridge established between development center (JSC) Research Centers (ARC, LARC), and industry (RI, LMSC, Corning, Mansville, 3M LTV, Union Carbide, Hexcel) for shuttle TPS; (2) not all test results adequately analyzed or in hindsight, completely encompassing all failure modes; (3) gap heating effects from ground facilities not totally indicative of flight experience; (4) need to design with operations in mind (not just to cost) example: moisture intrusion of GR/EP, many other examples; (5) RSI- developed as point design for maneuvering entry vehicle of high L/D; and (6) RSI - 15 years from invention to use on flight hardware. |
| NASA分類 | SPACECRAFT DESIGN, TESTING AND PERFORMANCE |
| レポートNO | 93N22097 |
| 権利 | No Copyright |
| URI | https://repository.exst.jaxa.jp/dspace/handle/a-is/122966 |
|
