| タイトル | Comparison of ORSAT and SCARAB Reentry Analysis Tools for a Generic Satellite Test Case |
| 本文（外部サイト） | http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20100005304 |
| 著者（英） | Hill, Nicole M.; Johnson, Nicholas L.; Rochelle, W. C.; Lips, T.; Kelley, Robert L. |
| 著者所属（英） | NASA Johnson Space Center |
| 発行日 | 2010-01-01 |
| 言語 | eng |
| 内容記述 | Reentry analysis is essential to understanding the consequences of the full life cycle of a spacecraft. Since reentry is a key factor in spacecraft development, NASA and ESA have separately developed tools to assess the survivability of objects during reentry. Criteria such as debris casualty area and impact energy are particularly important to understanding the risks posed to people on Earth. Therefore, NASA and ESA have undertaken a series of comparison studies of their respective reentry codes for verification and improvements in accuracy. The NASA Object Reentry Survival Analysis Tool (ORSAT) and the ESA Spacecraft Atmospheric Reentry and Aerothermal Breakup (SCARAB) reentry analysis tools serve as standard codes for reentry survivability assessment of satellites. These programs predict whether an object will demise during reentry and calculate the debris casualty area of objects determined to survive, establishing the reentry risk posed to the Earth's population by surviving debris. A series of test cases have been studied for comparison and the most recent uses "Testsat," a conceptual satellite composed of generic parts, defined to use numerous simple shapes and various materials for a better comparison of the predictions of these two codes. This study is an improvement on the others in this series because of increased consistency in modeling techniques and variables. The overall comparison demonstrated that the two codes arrive at similar results. Either most objects modeled resulted in close agreement between the two codes, or if the difference was significant, the variance could be explained as a case of semantics in the model definitions. This paper presents the main results of ORSAT and SCARAB for the Testsat case and discusses the sources of any discovered differences. Discussion of the results of previous comparisons is made for a summary of differences between the codes and lessons learned from this series of tests. |
| NASA分類 | Spacecraft Design, Testing and Performance |
| レポートNO | JSC-CN-20911
JSC-CN-19706 |
| 権利 | Copyright, Distribution as joint owner in the copyright |
|
