| タイトル | New Laboratory Methods for Characterizing the Immersion Factors for Irradiance |
| 本文（外部サイト） | http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20030112416 |
| 著者（英） | DAlimonte, Davide; Firestone, Elaine R.; Brown, James W.; Zibordi, Giuseppe; Hooker, Stanford B.; vaderLinde, Dirk |
| 著者所属（英） | NASA Goddard Space Flight Center |
| 発行日 | 2003-07-01 |
| 言語 | eng |
| 内容記述 | The experimental determination of the immersion factor, I(sub f)(lambda), of irradiance collectors is a requirement of any in-water radiometer. The eighth SeaWiFS Intercalibration Round-Robin Experiment (SIRREX-8) showed different implementations, at different laboratories, of the same I(sub f)(lambda) measurement protocol. The different implementations make use of different setups, volumes, and water types. Consequently, they exhibit different accuracies and require different execution times for characterizing an irradiance sensor. In view of standardizing the characterization of I(sub f)(lambda) values for in-water radiometers, together with an increase in the accuracy of methods and a decrease in the execution time, alternative methods are presented, and assessed versus the traditional method. The proposed new laboratory methods include: a) the continuous method, in which optical measurements taken with discrete water depths are substituted by continuous profiles created by removing the water from the water vessel at a constant flow rate (which significantly reduces the time required for the characterization of a single radiometer); and b) the Compact Portable Advanced Characterization Tank (ComPACT) method, in which the commonly used large tanks are replaced by a small water vessel, thereby allowing the determination of I(sub f)(lambda) values with a small water volume, and more importantly, permitting I(sub f)(lambda) characterizations with pure water. Intercomparisons between the continuous and the traditional method showed results within the variance of I(sub f) (lambda) determinations. The use of the continuous method, however, showed a much shorter realization time. Intercomparisons between the ComPACT and the traditional method showed generally higher I(sub f)(lambda) values for the former. This is in agreement with the generalized expectations of a reduction in scattering effects, because of the use of pure water with the ComPACT method versus the use of tap water with the traditional method. |
| NASA分類 | Oceanography |
| レポートNO | Rept-2003-01911-0/VOL26
NASA/TM-2003-206892/VOL26 |
| 権利 | Copyright, Distribution as joint owner in the copyright |
|
