| タイトル | Structural Evaluation of the RSRM Nozzle Replacement Adhesive |
| 本文（外部サイト） | http://hdl.handle.net/2060/20000004383 |
| 著者（英） | McLennan, M. L.; Richardson, D. E.; Batista-Rodriguez, A.; Palumbos, A. V. |
| 著者所属（英） | Thiokol Propulsion |
| 発行日 | 1999-01-01 |
| 言語 | eng |
| 内容記述 | This paper describes the structural performance evaluation of a replacement adhesive for the Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (RSRM) nozzle utilizing finite element analysis. Due to material obsolescence and industrial safety issues, the two current structural adhesives, EA 913 and EA 946 are to be replaced with a new adhesive. TIGA 321. The structural evaluation in support of the adhesive replacement effort includes residual stress, transportation, and flight analyses. Factors of safety are calculated using the stress response from each analysis. The factors of safety are used as the limiting criteria to compare the replacement adhesive against the current adhesives. Included in this paper are the analytical approach, assumptions and modeling techniques as well as the results of the evaluation. An important factor to the evaluation is the similarity in constitutive material properties (elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio) between TIGA 321 and EA 913. This similarity leads to equivalent material response from the two adhesives. However, TIGA 321 surpasses EA 913's performance due to higher material capabilities. Conversely, the change in stress response from EA 946 to TIGA 321 is more apparent: this is primarily attributed to the difference in the modulii of the two adhesives, which differ by two orders of magnitude. The results of the bondline evaluation indicate that the replacement adhesive provides superior performance than the current adhesives with only minor exceptions. Furthermore, TIGA 321 causes only a minor chance in the response of the phenolic and metal components. |
| NASA分類 | Spacecraft Propulsion and Power |
| 権利 | No Copyright |
|
